Why on earth would anyone test gonadal hormones in a 67 year old untreated woman?
This is of no clinical utility whatsoever, unless you had some kind of hormone secreting neoplasm which is exceptionally rare, they were always going to be in your boots.
It's like testing the woods for bear faeces.
Given that you have tested them, your results don't actually suck for someone your age - often FSH can be 80-90 IU or higher and estradiol usually lower. However they are nowhere near where they would have been in optimal health. For example the absolute minimum threshold to prevent bone loss is considered by the NHS to be 250pmol/L. Private specialists without the same budgetary constraints on prescribing would generally recommend over 300pmol/L.
I personally would never not be on hormone therapy, as I don't want osteoporosis or any of the other sequelae of chronic hypoestrogenism/hypoandrogenism.
I would base your own decision on your own individual health goals, including but not limited to the presence of any menopausal symptoms, but certainly not on hormone blood tests.
