I kind of think the truth is somewhere in the middle here, at least - for me - which is why I like Lara Briden's stuff.
By all that, I mean that I don't think progesterone is the solution to all ills but neither do I think it is an awful thing everyone should avoid. And I don't think the extremes about estrogen either. I totally believe some women when they say they need a blood level of 800pmol+ to feel okay. And I totally believe others who are not even sure they can tolerate a 25mcg patch. I totally believe some women who have debilitating side effects from progesterone and can't tolerate it even after persevering for months. And I totally believe others who really need it and seem immune to any negative side effects from it (like me).
Unfortunately I think many doctors get really polarised and set into their camp and way of reasoning and it then becomes very hard for them to step back into an unbiassed position and keep reassessing the evidence and revising their position. This goes for doctors on both side of the E and P thing.
For me, I'm not able to solve the entire world's mysteries when it comes to E and P and can only try to find a solution that works for me and my body. I'm reluctant to extrapolise from that to other people because it seems we are all so different. But I guess I do try to look out for people who may be experiencing a hormone in the same way as me.
But I think it's important to try to convey to women struggling the diversity of opinions out there so that, if the UK mainstream approach isn't working for them (as it didn't for me) they don't just give everything up and abandon themselves to zero hormones - but that they have a direction to go in, to research and investigate exactly which hormones they can take, in what quantities... Because surely taking some of our three hormones has to be better than none, as our ability to make our own declines.