I posted some months ago in the New Member section. I explained that I am 69 and was thinking about possibly asking to go on to Hrt for general health and wellbeing and wondering if I am too old.
I tried Hrt at the very beginning of my menopause at 51, but could not tolerate the progestogen side effects. To the best of my recollection I don't think Utrogestan was about then, but Crinone pessaries were and I remember asking my GP if could try those along with estrogen patches and she said they would not protect my womb. So that was the end of that.
At 60 I was diagnosed with osteoporosis in the spine, have been on bisphosphonate and Denosumab treatment and have never fractured (touch wood!).
I rang a specialist clinic (Studd) during the week and on the very good advice of a member here asked the secretary what my chances were of possibly being prescribed Hrt at my age. She assured me that would not be a problem assuming I had no contraindicated health conditions. So I now have an appointment for next month. I explained that I couldn't tolerate the progestogen component of Hrt and she said I would probably be put on progesterone for the shortest period of time.
I now have been mulling this over and my question is what sort of regime might I be put on? I have this probably unrealistic scenario in my head that the specialist will insist that I go onto 10 or 7 day progesterone regime as I am so intolerant to progestogens. But I don't want a bleed, no way. I would certainly try estrogen and progesterone daily. I am worried because of my past hormonal upheaval history of severe PMT, post natal depression, then having a horrible menopause that the daily progesterone will not suit me, though I know realistically that I won't know unless I try it.
I know I am meandering here, but would love some feedback on what I might expect from this appointment.
Many thanks.