Bear with me on this one, ladies! I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Last time I tried transdermal estradiol gel, I received Estrogel as my prescription. I liked the capped pump dispenser, and the dose always appeared to be uniform (I stopped it because I was asked to by my Cardiologist after having chest pain, as some of you may remember).
Fast forward a couple of months, and I am now again trying transdermal estradiol gel, but this time I have received Oestrodose as my prescription (no pharmacy I went to had Estrogel in stock, but they said this was the same product).
The pump is flimsy, with no cap. I've had niggling thoughts that the amount pumped each time wasn't consistent - tonight, I decided to do a controlled experiment and found that the pump sizes are indeed inconsistent in size, despite depressing the pump accurately and releasing it each time.
This time on Oestrodose, I have developed a nasty rash. I checked the ingredients on the stick on label and pack insert, and both claim identical ingredients to Estrogel. I have 3 pump packs of the Oestrodose, and 2 of them state that they are repackaged in the UK but by different companies, 1 based in Wimbledon and 1 in Doncaster. The other has labeling in French, and says that it is manufactured by Besins in Belgium (the company that makes Estrogel).
The 2 from the UK are runnier and have no smell to speak of. The one from Belgium has a faintly more 'alcohol' smell.
I have used the one produced by Besins tonight which I started this course of HRT with. For the last 2 weeks, I have used the other 2 packs and it's since then that I have developed the rash.
As I previously stated, ALL claim the ingredients are identical, but there is clearly a difference in texture. I'm also finding the irregular pump sizes disconcerting to say the least.
I never had any of these problems with Estrogel.
So - in my opinion there is clearly product inconsistency here. Oestrodose, to me, is NOT the same as Estrogel and seems to be inferior in quality of packaging, pump size consistency and texture - at least those that are repackaged in the UK.
I'm guessing the scenario is that the UK based companies who are 'repackaging' the gel are buying it in in bulk and this is an initiative to keep the cost down rather than buying in the finished product direct from Besins, thus making it a cheaper product to provide on prescription. I'm not sure what is taking place during the repackaging, but the gel consistency is not comparable with the product packaged at source.
If my observations are correct, this is worrying.
If anyone else has noticed anything similar, I'd like to hear your thoughts please. It's either that, or i'm going bonkers (yes......I know, before you say anything)!
Thank you!