There is plenty of evidence ( papers) which show that transdermal routes are safe ( er) re. blood clots because they don't affect the lipid levels in the blood in the same way.
http://www.clotcare.com/hormonebirthcontrolpatchbloodclotrisk.aspxThis article shows no risk for transdermal routes
http://min.sagepub.com/content/19/2/59.shortsee
Routes and RegimesEven the worst case scenario- as in the MW and WHI studies showed these figures ( and this was for equine oestrogens/ synthetic progestogens)
non-HRT users 1 stroke/clot per 10 000 women, HRT users 3:10 000.
Those figures are very small and the women in the studies were overweight ( most were obese) and unfit.
The problem in all of this is that nothing in life is risk free: 10 people every day in the UK die on the roads. On that basis none of us should get in a car if we really wanted to avoid 'risk'. But no, people use cars for convenience and quality of life.
My gynae actually said that getting in a car and travelling on the motorway is riskier than taking HRT.
Also, more women die from the complications of osteoporosis in old age than from breast cancer.
I'm afraid I think that too many drs are misogynists and patronising too!
There are risks to HRT but they are very small if the right kind of HRT is taken- and that ought to exclude tablets- which drs continue to dish out even though they are less safe and this has been known for ages and ages. Ditto equine oestrogens rather than bioidentical.
It's all about risks and benefits, alongside quality of life.