Hi Sunnygirl and Carms
from me too!
Sunnygirl - you are only just over the average age of natural menopause which is 51/52, so the years you were taking HRT until then do not count in terms of risk, as your body should have been producing oestrogen and progesterone anyway. If you look at the info on this site the benefits of taking HRT exceed the risks under the age of 60.
http://www.menopausematters.co.uk/balance.phpSo sorry to hear about your mum too, but at least you know that it wasn't hormone related so you are not at any greater risk. In any case your doc should give you the choice whether or not to take any known risks, having explained them to you (if they are knowledgeable that is). I completely agree re the Citalopram - the new NICE Guideliens say that ADs should not be offered as the first line of treatment fo menopausal symptoms, if there are no medical contra-indications which are listed here:
http://www.menopausematters.co.uk/contraindications.php Pregnancy
Undiagnosed abnormal vaginal bleeding
Active or recent blood clot or myocardial infarction (heart attack)
Suspected or active breast or endometrial (womb) cancer
Active liver disease with abnormal liver function tests
Porphyria cutanea tardaI am still taking HRT at 62 and have been on it for 9 years.
Do go back and print off any relevant information from this site if it helps. At this point, as you have stopped and your symptoms have returned - you might like to try a different type of HRT for example Femoston, which contains estradiol - bio-dentical oestrogen, and dydrogesterone - which is very similar to your own progesterone. If this suits you then you will be able to continue until at least 60. She should not make you feel stupid - she is the one that sadly, seems not as well -informed as she could be.
Carms - how old are you? There is no reason to stop HRT as you will see from the above - unless you fit into one of those categories. Read as much as you can before you go to your appointment!
Hope this helps
Hurdity x