Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please have a look at the questionnaire page if you have a spare minute.

media

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: guardian article on gp backlash  (Read 4471 times)

laszla

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 404
guardian article on gp backlash
« on: June 16, 2022, 12:19:38 AM »

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/jun/15/doctors-warn-against-over-medicalising-menopause-after-uk-criticism

Davina's recent documentary seems to have irked the doctors. This article looks at a new paper just published in the BMJ opining against the 'medicalisation' of the menopause.
I found the whole thing hugely disappointing, particularly the comments of the (female) doctor at the end - pretty much dismissing the widespread concerns raised in the documentary and generally these days about many GPs' incompetence surrounding the menopause and HRT.
It certainly didn't take long for a backlash to set in after a few years of awareness raising.
Logged

Peana

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2022, 07:34:59 AM »

I must admit, I can see both sides, and we should avoid over-medicalising a natural process.  It is important to take responsibility to maintain regular exercise, health eating, etc..  If I remember this correctly, Davina did address this in her first doc., although I don't remember it in the second, however, we're not children, and I think it can be assumed that by the time we hit menopause we know this.  I couldn't survive without HRT as it has made such a difference to my anxiety, mood swings, and depression.

What is really annoying me at the moment is the Tena menopause advert.  There is no way I could use the dryer in the loos to dry my armpits - I'd just melt!

Basically, we all experience menopause differently, and some need more help that others.  If we need help, we shouldn't have to fight for it.


Logged

Stella2

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 274
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2022, 08:24:33 AM »

I just read the article and i agree that the menopause should be seen as a natural phase of life. I wanted to embrace the positives like life experience, confidence gained, more enjoyment and interests when not focused on looks. I learnt a lot and change my lifestyle to much healthier. However, hot flushes were so persistent and constant. I suffered for 5 years before i went the HRT way and the HRT saved me. I assume that most of us on HRT would stop if we knew that the symptoms subsided.

I am a bit concerned with recommendations to use the HRT as a preventative measure, as many of us know, there is no HRT formula that fits all. Why to disrupt the balance if that's not necessary?

Logged

joziel

  • Guest
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2022, 09:15:20 PM »

The whole 'is it natural' thing is just ridiculous. Why are we even having that discussion?

Do we discuss whether we should allow people to die of cancer because it is a 'natural' process? Or perhaps we should not replace hips and knees with artificial sockets because those are 'not natural' either. In fact, perhaps we should all just go back to living in thatched hovels and wearing wool clothes and whilst we roast bison over an open fire - because that's much more 'natural' than modern day life, right? So it must be better for us?? Wait though... is creating fire natural? Because no other species creates fire. Maybe we just have to hunt animals and devour them raw, tear their flesh with our teeth..... because that's the most 'natural' thing... I mean - cutlery isn't natural, is it?

Death is the most natural thing. So is disease. Does that mean we should embrace death and disease??

Sorry but the 'it's natural' thing is a complete red herring and ridiculous line of discussion. Natural schmateral. Who cares.

The conversation to be having is about determining what is optimal and whether the benefits outweigh the risks for your current and future health.

Frankly I think the truth of the current situation goes like this: The medical establishment doesn't easily turn around 180 degrees and go from 'smallest amount of estrogen for the briefest time' to 'you must all take this for your future health permanently'. It is going to take years for this creaking ship to turn around. There is going to be a gradual climb-down. It won't happen overnight.

Second, the BMS is scared of personalities like Dr Louise Newson carrying more weight and influence than they do. They are supposed to be the Official Body, not an individual doctor who has a tremendous platform and following. They can't just repeat everything she advises, only after she has advised it. That just makes them look like they are trailing after her. They have to assert some different stance and take issue with her in some way. It's politics and it sucks. You'd hope they could all put politics aside and just focus on science.

Third, there are already HRT shortages from increased demand. If they told women that actually most women really should take this stuff for their future health, there would be fisticuffs at dawn outside pharmacies and women doing dodgy deals down back alleys or selling organ parts for patches or something. It would be anarchy. So until they can actually meet the demand and supply it to everyone, they can't recommend that almost everyone take it without society falling apart  ;D which it kinda already is, but that's a whole other subject  ;D

So you gotta read these conservative 'women get back in your box, crane your necks in, check yourselves' articles with these issues in mind. I might now get evicted from here for saying all this, but there we go  ;D
Logged

laszla

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 404
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2022, 11:22:33 PM »

Joziel, it is absurd and while I agree that the underlying mechanism behind these attitidues and comments is as you say the result of defensiveness/pride/keeping face etc., I am surprised at the dismissiveness with which these doctors are publically articulating their counter attack with some very woolly comments about 'medicalisation' and 'natural' this and that (and extra disappointing that they are women).

It is insulting to fail to recognise how many women are let down/ignored by GPs for menopause support - practically every day on this forum someone posts about how their GP tried to give them anti-depressants/come off HRT/refuse to prescribe tesosterone etc etc.

Right, back to my raw bison.
Logged

Joaniepat

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1794
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2022, 07:10:31 AM »

https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2021-069369/rr?fbclid=IwAR2XTlSWiMtPM9EmVvnKbsgNCXIaz8D-9ZmrX3d_XDPK-UPLLClVBwLObq8

Nice response from Louise Newson and others in the BMJ.

Great posts, joziel and laszla. They could usefully describe menopause as "inevitable" rather than "natural".

JP x
Logged

ATB

  • Guest
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2022, 07:47:16 AM »

Oh Joziel! I couldn’t agree more!! I wish there was a like button!! Everything you said is absolutely bang on.

The constant narrative that this is ‘natural’ let’s not medicalise a natural process, is just a crock of s*** that doesn’t get used when men have a problem, it is *only* used as a response to women. The moment we start having a decent conversation about HRT & menopause we get the pick me women and the defensive GP’s going on about this natural process crap again. Child birth is natural but we have plenty of help with that! It’s just a really lazy argument that ignores the physical and mental impact of menopause on a lot of women. Women are already afraid and embarrassed to discuss it and these responses make that worse. They should be ashamed of themselves.
Logged

Marchlove

  • Guest
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2022, 08:37:00 AM »

Great posts!

Just had a look at the BMJ article and the Competing Interests.
Two of them from  what they have declared, appear to have conflict of interest!

Logged

Peripurple

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 95
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2022, 09:26:52 AM »

Jozial you summed it up perfectly.  Quite frankly there was nothing natural about having my vagina on fire, in pain, sore and itching impacting my mental health for a whole year before I was finally given local oestrogen!  It has been widely reported that GP’s used to only receive 3 hours training on the menopause, this may have now increased, but generally a majority of the medical profession certainly don’t have a good understanding unless they take a specific interest in it.  It infuriates me.
Logged

CLKD

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 79068
  • changes can be scary, even when we want them
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2022, 10:23:04 AM »

I couldn't read it all, such rubbish they do spout.  From an Australian ........

If ladies don't require treatment for peri-menopause symptoms then why do so many visit their GPs/Health Advisors across the World?  If the issue gets into the main stream Media women are going to look up and realise that they no longer have to suffer. 

Writing in the British Medical Journal they said there was an urgent need for a more realistic and balanced narrative which actively challenges the idea that menopause is synonymous with an inevitable decline in women’s health and wellbeing, and called for continued efforts to improve awareness about the symptoms and how to deal with them.

That would be how exactly? As stated, Life is natural.  So R arsenic, digitalis ..........  ::)

I wonder why the Guardian even bothered to print this other than to encourage readership.  What I read: 2.5 paragraphs B4 exasperation took over, seems to be garnering more readers than being a balanced view.  Which GPs - in the UK or where?

Good that all GPs are being made aware of our needs.  Perhaps if we had a list of those who won't prescribe HRT etc., we can avoid them!!



« Last Edit: June 17, 2022, 10:26:04 AM by CLKD »
Logged

ATB

  • Guest
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2022, 10:36:17 AM »

I actually do expect this from the guardian, used to be a reader but their disdain for women has been clear to me for some time.
Logged

laszla

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 404
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2022, 02:17:09 PM »

Some excellent responses to the BMJ article (see link above kindly provided by Joanipat), of which two, thankfully, are from right-minded GPs.

To sum them up:
Louise Newson refers to the authors’ comments as “medical gaslighting”;
Kate Muir (producer of Davina’s docs who has undertaken considerable and, crucially, recent research) draws attention to the ludicrously outdated studies upon which the authors base their text;
GP Helen Purser gives some non-menopause examples that illustrate the absurdity of the ‘unnatural’ brigade – eg. a patient deciding to stop all medications as they are ‘unnatural’, ascribing angina symptoms to ‘cultural conditioning’, being ok with dying younger because it’s ‘natural’ etc.
GP Andrew Coward (who is anything but!) merits quoting at some length for the crucial argument he presents:

“At the start of the 20th century women lived till 50 years on average, had 4 children, were broadly not in the workplace and died from pneumonia or TB. Now women live to 81, have 1.75 children, the vast majority work, and die from dementia and vascular disease. This begs the question of how we define “ normality” for women in terms of birth, periods, work, menopause, or mortality. Is it normal for 65% of dementia patients to be in women? Is it normal for 10% of women to quit their jobs as a direct result of the menopause with fatigue, anxiety, and brain fog particularly problematic?

Could it be that this modern phenomenon of living almost half your female life without oestrogen is the cause for both excessive disease and disabling symptoms?

As a man I am relieved that male hypogonadism is not normalised because it presents with distressing symptoms such as lethargy, sleep disturbance, low mood and decreased strength and is entirely treatable with HRT in the form of testosterone. […] I am surprised that the BMJ published this without asking these questions to Hickey et al as of prime importance unless, of course, you have slipped unconsciously and indirectly into the all pervasive world of male entitlement.”

Round of applause from me. I also liked this tweet in response to the Guardian article “Pushback from doctors trade group BMJ when the group represented by them is questioned. Medical misogyny is alive and well”.

Hopefully there will be more replies and this degrading (to women and the medical profession) article will simply accelerate and strengthen the drive to parity.

CLKD – I like the idea of a register of GPs who won’t prescribe HRT without good reason – something along the lines of those rogue landlord databases  ;)
Logged

CLKD

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 79068
  • changes can be scary, even when we want them
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2022, 02:19:50 PM »

Well Done U !   :medal:  tnx for explaining in detail. 
Logged

Marchlove

  • Guest
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #13 on: June 17, 2022, 02:27:14 PM »

Great laszla, they’ve got some nerve.
‘Trade Group’ that made me laugh ;D

Rogue doctors it is then CLKD! X
Logged

CLKD

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 79068
  • changes can be scary, even when we want them
Re: guardian article on gp backlash
« Reply #14 on: June 17, 2022, 02:28:34 PM »

Yep - if it weren't so hot I would fire up that charabanc and be on my way to nag at No 10.  However  ;D
Logged
Pages: [1] 2