thanks for the link. I wonder how many GPs will find time to read it though.
When I asked at the meno clinic once about testosterone, they said way too problematic. I see there's a bit * next to it in the draft report as well.
I also noticed that (if I read it right) the report doesn't state that the million woman studies were based on non bio-identical hormones like Premarin. They suggest they were flawed, but for other reasons. The sense I would get of the whole caboodle if I were a GP was to on-refer to meno clinics.
One of the 2 GPs in my surgery does this (says he knows nothing about HRT) and the other (female) is scared stiff of it and think it'll kill you if taken for longer than 5 years. She even thinks vagifem can give you cancer. Both of them are in their 40s.
At OH's (better) surgery, most of the women GPs are very wary of HRT according to other people I know at that practice (OH didn't ask for it

).